- Have any questions?
- +1 (781) 656 7962
- support@cheapnursingpapers.com
Mental Health Nursing in TOPAS The Older People Assessment Service
This assignment provides you with an opportunity to demonstrate your strength in critically assessing all the above features in an area of health or social care service within the scope of your employment (Mental Health Nursing in TOPAS The Older People Assessment Service). The objective is to produce a management report which provides clinical or managerial guidelines on how to improve continuity and coordination of care or treatment, enabling more effective resource planning
Assignment Briefing (level 7)
| Module Name | Managing Health Services for Quality |
| Module Code | xxxxx |
| Assignment Title | Review of Quality Management in an Organisation |
| Type of Submission | Management Report |
| Weighting of the assignment in the overall module grade | 100% |
| Word Count/Time allocation (for presentations) | 3000 words |
| Issue Date | |
| Submission Date | 22/01/2018 |
| Assignment Task |
| This assignment provides you with an opportunity to demonstrate your strength in critically assessing all the above features in an area of health or social care service within the scope of your employment (Mental Health Nursing in TOPAS The Older People Assessment Service). The objective is to produce a management report which provides clinical or managerial guidelines on how to improve continuity and coordination of care or treatment, enabling more effective resource planningYour assignment should include:
· Definition of the service concept of your chosen service, and an outline of the current service delivery process. · An evaluation of its current effectiveness · An identification of specific problem areas, or opportunities for further development · Identification of appropriate measures by which to judge the performance of the process · Recommendations for improvement to the service and if appropriate, changes to the means by which quality is measured.
Format: The management report should be no longer than 3,000 words (excluding Appendices & References). The structure is as follows:
Context:
Understanding the needs of the service user is a crucial precursor in service design. Service design requires one to consider the nature of the operating system (the resources to be employed and the type of process which best serves the system objectives amongst other factors), to establish the measures which will assess the performance of the operating system, and to choose an appropriate quality management system which will ensure these measures are met at a satisfactory or greater level. The service design, however, has to take into account the needs of other stakeholders, whose expectations might not be directly aligned with those of the immediate service user.
|
Allocation of Marks
| Section/element | Allocated Marks |
| Coursework : Management Report | 100 |
FEEDBACK ON THE WRITTEN ELEMENTS OF THE MODULE WILL BE BASED ON POSTGRADUATE GRADE CRITERIA:
| CLASS | % | GRADE | OVERALL DESCRIPTION | GUIDELINE GRADE DESCRIPTIONS |
| Distinction | 85-100 | A+ | Outstanding | Your work is of an exceptionally high standard which has the potential for submission for publication in a peer reviewed journal or equivalent. |
| 75-84 | A | Excellent | Your work demonstrates a sophisticated and comprehensive knowledge of the subject area. You have shown an exceptional ability in the appropriate use of the relevant literature, theory, methodologies, practices or tools to analyse and synthesise at Masters level. Your work is well-constructed and demonstrates a professional approach to academic practice (citation and referencing; appropriate presentation format; clear, accurate English). It addresses the learning outcomes/assessment criteria fully. | |
| 70-74 | A- | Very Good | Your work demonstrates strong knowledge of the subject area and the ability to develop an independent and sophisticated argument or evaluation. The ideas you put forward demonstrate exceptional clarity and focus and your work adheres to the principles of good academic practice (citation and referencing; appropriate presentation format; clear, accurate English). It addresses the learning outcomes/assessment criteria fully. | |
| Merit | 67-69 | B+ | Good
|
Your work demonstrates a well-developed critical and comprehensive understanding of the topic. It shows evidence that you have thoroughly researched the topic(s) and are able to construct an independent, logical argument or evaluation. Your work demonstrates a high degree of ability in the appropriate use of relevant literature, theory, methodologies, practices or tools to analyse and synthesise at Masters level. Your work is well-structured and logically written and demonstrates good academic practice (citation and referencing; appropriate presentation format; clear, accurate English). There is a good attempt to address the learning outcomes/assessment criteria, meeting all of them to some extent and some of them well. |
| 64-66 | B |
|
||
| 60-63 | B- | |||
| Pass | 57-59 | C+ | Satisfactory
|
Your work demonstrates knowledge of the subject area and the ability to develop an independent, logical argument or evaluation. It shows competence in the appropriate use of literature, theory, methodologies, practices or tools. The development of some ideas in your work is limited but it attempts to analyse materials critically. At times the expression and structure of your work is not clear and you have not consistently followed good academic practice (citation and referencing; presentation format; clear, accurate English). Your work provides some level of response to the learning outcomes/assessment criteria but does not fully address all of the criteria. |
| 54-56 | C | |||
| 50-53 | C- | |||
| Marginal Fail | 45-49 | MF | Unsatisfactory | Your work contains some weaknesses. It provides some evidence that you have understood the topic and that you are able structure arguments or evaluation. Your work demonstrates some ability in the appropriate use of literature, theory, methodologies, practices or tools but not at Masters level. Your work fails to address one or more criteria fully. |
| Fail | 35-44 | F | Poor | Your work is unsatisfactory in it demonstrates very limited knowledge of the subject area and does not succeed in grasping the key issues There is little evidence of development of ideas and critical analysis is very limited. The presentation is confused and lacks coherence. Your work does not meet the learning outcomes/assessment criteria. |
| 0-35 | Very poor | Your work demonstrates no real knowledge of the subject area and does not display the critical ability required at this level. Your work does not attempt to address the learning outcomes/assessment criteria adequately. |
| Avoiding plagiarismWhen you write an essay, report or dissertation you should always cite the published sources to which you quote, refer to or use as evidence, otherwise you are likely to be committing plagiarism, which is a form of academic misconduct with potentially very serious consequences. References need to be made both within the text and in a list at the end.
The aim in doing this is to ensure that somebody reading your work can easily find these sources for themselves. This applies to whether you are using a book, a report, a journal article or an Internet site. You will probably know from your own experience how much easier it is to find a reference when a reading list or bibliography is clear and unambiguous. |
"Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us"
Use the following coupon
FIRST15
Order Now
Hi there! Click one of our representatives below and we will get back to you as soon as possible.