Reflection in practice

Task Description :
There are two parts to this assessment (submit both parts together in one Word Document). Part 2 commences on the next page.

Assessment Overview: The purpose of assessment 1 is for you to reflect on your values, core qualities and beliefs about you as a person and as a professional, identify and discuss your personal and professional strengths and areas for improvement and to demonstrate why self-reflection is important for you in your personal and professional life. In addition, you will have the opportunity to compare and contrast two reflection models in part 2.

Part 1 (800-1000 words) Complete a self-reflection (do not use a formal reflection model for this part of the assessment). During your reflection, you are required to:
1. Identify and discuss at least 3 values that guide your decisions in your personal and professional life.

2. Identify and discuss your personal and professional strengths and why they are important for your personal and professional development. Include what inspires you, your core qualities, passion and your strengths as a professional colleague

3. Define in your own words, your understanding of person-centred care for yourself and others. (gathered from a variety of existing definitions which must be acknowledged/referenced)

4. Identify and discuss at least 2 person-centred communication skills you possess and why you think they are important to you as a person and as a professional

5. Identify and discuss at least 2 person-centred strategies you use to empower and care for yourself

6. Identify and discuss which areas you wish to improve upon and why they are important for your personal and professional development

7. Identify and discuss at least 2 person-centred strategies you currently use to plan and achieve your professional goals and how they benefit your practice

8. Identify and discuss at least 2 person-centred strategies (apart from a formal reflective model) you use to reflect on your on your professional practice

Part 2 (500-700 words) provides you with the opportunity to compare and contrast two (2) models of reflection. You will use one of these models when you complete Assessment 2
Choose one of the following reflection models (Rolfe or Gibbs) and compare and contrast it with the Wanda, Fowler and Wilson 2016 model. (Models are available in the Reflection Models section of the SNPG950 Moodle Site)

1. What do you perceive to be the strengths, limitations, similarities and differences of each model and why?
2. Which model do you prefer and why? (if you are undecided explain why)
It is crucial to acknowledge your sources of information by supporting your discussion with evidence from the literature (in-text and in a reference list on a separate page at the end of the essay).

Use the first person (I//we/me/my/our) when referring to yourself and when you are part of a group. Use the third person (the nurse, the client, he, she, it, him, his, her, hers, they, their,) when referring to others/things. Do not use the second person (your, your, yours).

Remember, the combined total for both parts of this assessment is 1500 words. Be clear and concise yet comprehensive in your writing. Start reading and writing as soon as possible so you have time to critically examine and understand the literature before teasing out the key points/themes for discussion.
Use of creative formats that support your interpretation, analysis and discussion are encouraged. For example (but not limited to):
• •? Video 3-5 minutes, including a credits/referencing section either within the video or in the reference list in the submitted Word document (Provide a link to the uploaded video within the Word document) [YouTube or Vimeo]
• •? Use of spoken word, poetry, song, dance, walking with commentary, images, drawing, digital storytelling and diagrams
• •? Submit both assessment parts together in the same word document including any links to any multimedia used.

assessment Rubric (marks):
1\ Identification and discussion of at least 3 values that guide personal and professional decisions 10%: At least three values. Identification and discussion of values is insightful. Significance of the reflecting on values to improve practice is discussed at depth.

2/ Reflection on personal and professional strengths, areas for improvement, and definition of person- centred care of self and others 20%: Detailed, focused reflection, demonstrating a high level of self- awareness and critical thinking related to strengths and areas for improvement.
Definition demonstrates a thorough understanding of person-centred care
3/ Identification and discussion of at least two person-centred strategies relating to: 1. personal and professional reflection (1 of each)
2. communication (2)
3. self-empowerment

and self- care (1 of each) (2 strategies for each element) 10%: At least 2 person-centred strategies identified and discussed for each element. Thorough, relevant discussion throughout, including person-centred approaches to communicate with and empower self.

4/ Identification and discussion of at least two person-centred strategies relating to planning and achieving professional development goals and how they benefit practice 10%: At least 2 person-centred strategies relating to planning and achieving personal and professional goals identified. Significance of professional development to practice is clearly demonstrated.

5/ Compare and contrast two reflection models (one of which is a non- western model) 30%: Understanding of the process of comparing and contrasting is clearly and concisely demonstrated. Strengths, limitations, similarities and differences thoroughly discussed overall. Preference/reason for non-preference is clearly communicated at depth.

6/ Academic Writing 10%: Presented a well-structured discussion in academic style with a clear and logical flow. Mostly correct spelling and grammar and appropriate terminology used throughout.

7/ Referencing 10%: Provided a comprehensive reference list and accurately referenced most sources using the Author- Date Harvard. Minor errors noted.
Reflection for Practice: Task 1

Event Description
In the last year on my night shift, when I worked in Emergency department in Mental Health and Addiction hospital. A 45 year- old male came to Emergency department by the police he was the addiction patient and diagnosed as dual diagnosis related to use amphetamine for the long-time period. When I covered this patient I asked him you have any history medical problem regarding to the nursing assessment, he had told me yes, I felt myocarditis I believe him because that’s my values in nursing when a patient told anything whether psychiatric or addiction patient should be believe this patient, so I documented in nursing assessment and I informed the doctor about it but he do not care about it, because in the mental and addiction hospital sometimes the doctors not believe the patient especially the dual diagnosis patients and they called them disingenuous patients because when they admission to hospital by police they want to stay the long time in the hospital because they are punishment and imprisonment of them and in this case that the patient has stay a half duration in hospital he is pardoned. Also, When I covered this patient, he complains chest pain, so I administered oxygen by face mask. Also, I informed the doctor about this issue. However, I called the medical doctor as well to see the patient, he came and changed diagnosis from dual diagnosis to myocarditis diagnosis and he reassessment as a protocol in ministry of health. Also, the therapeutic therapy team informed the family of patient about that happened to the patient, so they were shocked when they knew that he had a heart problem and that may could threaten his life. Now, they considered him sick and must come to the hospital while he was in dual diagnosis they did not come with the patient and did not ask about his health because he was addicted. So, the family change the value of culture of the addiction patient that it is a disease of the same as any other disease in which an individual person suffers and that it is necessary to support and encourage from the family and stand with the patient until the healing and get rid of addiction. In addition, the thinking of some of the treated team of doctors and counsellors and recovery specialist and psychologist, that addiction is considered a disease and not bad behaviour as some of them believe that and this is change the concept of addiction as disease and is treated with correction behaviour, increase faith, support the motivation and treatment as well. So, they changed that opinion of an addiction patient like another patient need to treatment and rehabilitation and increasing support and motivation as well to achievement the goal of healing.

1/ (this is my story please using during my assignment because I work in Mental Health hospital)

2/ Avoid plagiarism.

3/ please, use the clearly academic words in my assignment, because the English is my second language.

4/ please, send to me all references you are using during my assignment.

References: ( when you added any reference should be tell me about it).

Carper, BA 1978, ‘Fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing’, Advances in Nursing Science, vol.1, no.1, pp.13
International Council of Nurses 2012, ‘The ICN code of Ethics for Nurses’. Available at: www.icn.ch. Accessed on 2017/08/22.
Siobon, N 2012 ‘The lost path of emancipatory practice: towards a history of reflective practice of nursing’. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com. Assessed on 2017/08/22.
Tashiro, J et al. ‘Concept analysis of reflection in nursing professional development’. Japan Journal of Nursing Science 2013 December. Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed Assessed on 2017/08/22.
WHO, Health Topic, ‘Nursing’ Available at https://www.who.int/topics/nursing Assessed on 2017/08/22.