Write my Essay on PRIVITIZATION OF NHS (National Health Trust) WOULD RESULT IN SHORTER WAITING TIMES.

PRIVITIZATION OF NHS (National Health Trust) WOULD RESULT IN SHORTER WAITING TIMES. DISCUSS

Order Description

ARGUMENT ESSAY
Essay Topic: PRIVITIZATION OF NHS (National Health Trust) WOULD RESULT IN SHORTER WAITING TIMES. DISCUSS
WRITE IN THE THIRD PERSON
Note: –
BBC statistics will be more up to date. Make sure language used is Academic
Only Use Website with: .ac, .org,.gov . (If using Google scholar must use source from . ac, .org,.gov)

3 PARTS:
Part 1: Detailed Essay Plan (1 page)
Provide a detailed essay plan for each paragraph. Use template provided (ACRE Argument Essay outline).
Part 2: 1,100 words essay (4 pages)
Part 3: Presentation-5 Slides (2 pages)

Part 1: Detailed Essay Plan (1 page)
Provide a detailed essay plan for each paragraph. Use template provided (ACRE Argument Essay outline).
Part 2: 1,100 words essay:
IMPORTANT! ESSAY GUIDELINES
1. This assessment is an argument-style essay of 1,050 words.
Essay most include references to source material to show that topic have been researched and that you know how to integrate sources into your writing.

ARGUMENT ESSAY STRUCTURE:

Each Paragraph should deal with a single topic, the length of the paragraph must not be less than 5 sentences, All the parts of a paragraph must be linked together by
phrases

INTRODUCTION includes: background information to the topic, detailed information relating to the problem, a thesis statement (150 words)

Each paragraph Must be written in this structure: Argument-Counter Argument-Rebuttal-Evidence/Example

ACRE Stands for = Argument-Counter Argument-Rebuttal-Evidence/Example

Body paragraph 1: ACRE (200 words)
Body paragraph 2: ACRE (200 words)
Body paragraph 3: ACRE (200 words)
Body paragraph 4: ACRE (200 words)
CONCLUSION includes: summary of body paragraphs, restatement of the thesis statement, future prediction or recommendation (100 words)
Reference list: to include all references cited in the essay (in Harvard style)

PART 3 PRESENTATION:
GUIDELINES:
1. Part Three is an individual presentation. This presentation is based upon the essay topic: PRIVITIZATION of NHS WOULD RESULT IN SHOTER WAITING TIMES. DISCUSS, the
presentation should be in PowerPoint format
The presentation should have a structure like the essay i.e. INTRODUCTION – MAIN SECTION – CONCLUSION – REFERENCE LIST. (slides)
2. The PowerPoint slides should be VISUAL AIDS and must support what is will be said in the presentation with an image or diagram. Slides MUST NOT be filled with text.
4. Just like the essay, the presentation should include references to source material, including images, to show thorough research of the topic and knowledge of how to
integrate sources into your slides.

? Individual PRESENTATION structure – Visuals Must be clear and should support the presentation.

INTRODUCTION includes: background information to the topic, detailed information relating to the problem, a thesis statement

Main body slides

Main body slides

Main body slides

Main body slides

CONCLUSION includes: summary of slides, restatement of the thesis statement, future prediction or recommendation

Reference list: to include all references cited in the presentation (in Harvard style on the last slide of your presentation which you must show at the end)
READING LIST:
• Fight grows to stop NHS privatization.(news)(Brief article)
The Dissector: Journal of the Perioperative Nurses College of the New Zealand Nurses Organisation, June, 2011, Vol.39(1), p.8(1
• Privatization of NHS must not be allowed
British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing), 2002, Vol.11(2), pp.83
• Privatization of the NHS
Shambaugh, George E
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1997, Vol.90(5), pp.299-299
• Creeping privatization of the NHS
Anonymous
British Journal of Nursing, May 8-May 21, 2003, Vol.12(9), p.52
• Walshe, K., 2003. Foundation hospitals: a new direction for NHS reform?. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 96(3), pp.106-110.

• Walshe, K., 2003. Foundation hospitals: a new direction for NHS reform?. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 96(3), pp.106-110.

• Powell, M. and Miller, R., 2013. Privatizing the english national health service: an irregular verb?. Journal of health politics, policy and law, 38(5), pp.1051-
1059.

• Smith, R., 2005. The private sector in the English NHS: from pariah to saviour in under a decade. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 173(3), pp.273-274.

• Smith, J., 2011. NHS future forum: is anyone listening?.

• Almeida, Á.S., 2017. The role of private non-profit healthcare organizations in NHS systems: Implications for the Portuguese hospital devolution program. Health
Policy, 121(6), pp.699-707.

• Klein, R., 2015. England’s National Health Service—Broke but Not Broken. The Milbank Quarterly, 93(3), pp.455-458.

• Powell, M. and Miller, R., 2013. Privatizing the english national health service: an irregular verb?. Journal of health politics, policy and law, 38(5), pp.1051-
1059.