• Examine each workflow model using the basic requirements outlined in the Course Project. Consider the following:
  • Does each draft use standard Visio workflow shapes for start and end points, basic steps, and decision points?
  • Are all points connected with arrows flowing in the correct direction?
  • Are swimlanes present to identify who completes each task?
• Carefully read through each workflow model.
  • Does it make sense?
  • What areas are unclear or confusing?
  • Are all decision points adequately explained?
  • What parts need additional detail?
• Identify at least one additional gap in each workflow. For example, this may be a redundant task, an unnecessary task, an ineffective system or process, or an area where staff need support. What meaningful use objective or objectives are related to the identified gap?
• Note: Before you submit your initial post, replace the subject line (“RE: Discussion – Week 6”) with “Peer Review of _________.” Fill in the blank with the first and last name of the colleague whose Visio draft you reviewed.

With these thoughts in mind:

Post your reviews of your colleagues’ Visio drafts. Identify any basic requirements (standard workflow shapes, arrow directions, decision points, swimlanes, etc.) that are unmet or need revision. Also identify areas that lack information and what additional detail is necessary to clarify those areas. Describe the gap you identified in the workflow and explain how it is related to at least one meaningful use objective.

I need ONE Peer Review for each of the different Visio drafts please