Walden US and Netherlands HIV/AIDS Healthcare System Comparison Paper

Published by admin at December 26, 2023

Tags

RUBRIC

Global Healthcare Issues and Policies Part 1: Global Health Comparison Matrix Focusing on the country you selected and the U.S., complete the Global Health Comparison Matrix. Be sure to address the following: • Consider the U.S. national/federal health policies that have been adapted for the global health issue you selected from the WHO global health agenda. Compare these policies to the additional country you selected for study.	Points: Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%) Response provides a clear and accurate explanation of the strengths and weaknesses of policies in the U.S. and another country. Response provides a clear and accurate explanation of how the social determinants of health impact the issue in the U.S. and in another country. Specific examples are provided. Response provides a clear and accurate explanation of how the governments of the two countries address cost, quality, and access related to the issue. Response provides a clear and accurate explanation of how the policy in each of the two countries impacts the health of the global population. Detailed and accurate supporting examples are provided. Response provides a clear and complete explanation of how the policies in each country impact the role of the nurse. Response provides an accurate and detailed explanation of how the global health issues impact local healthcare organizations and policies in each of the two countries. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%) Response provides an explanation of the strengths and weaknesses of policies in the U.S. and another country. Response provides an explanation of how the social determinants of health impact the issue in the U.S. and in another country. Specific examples may be provided. Response provides an explanation of how the governments of the two countries address cost, quality, and access related to the issue. Response provides an explanation of how the policy in each of the two countries impacts the health of the global population. Supporting examples may be provided. Response provides an explanation of how the policies in each country impact the role of the nurse. Response provides an explanation of how the global health issues impact local healthcare organizations and policies in each of the two countries. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%) Explanation of the strengths and weaknesses of policies in the U.S. and another country is vague or inaccurate. Explanation of how the social determinants of health impact the issue in the U.S. and another country, and/or the examples, are vague or inaccurate. Explanation of how the governments of the two countries address cost, quality, and access related to the issue is vague or inaccurate. Explanation of how the policy in each of the two countries impacts the health of the global population, and/or supporting examples, is vague or inaccurate. Explanation of how the policies in each country impact the role of the nurse is vague or incomplete. Explanation of how global health issues impact local healthcare organizations and policies in each of the two countries is vague or inaccurate. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%) Explanation of the strengths and weaknesses of policies in the U.S. and another country is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Explanation of how the social determinants of health impact the issue in the U.S. and in another country, and the examples, are vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Explanation of how the governments of the two countries address cost, quality, and access related to the issue is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Explanation of how the policy in each of the two countries impacts the global population, and supporting examples, is missing. Explanation of how the policies in each country impact the role of the nurse is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Explanation of how global health issues impact local healthcare organizations and policies in both countries is missing. Feedback:
The Nurse’s Role in Global Healthcare Part 2: A Plan for Social Change Reflect on the global health policy comparison and analysis you conducted in Part 1 of the Assignment. In a 1-page response, create a plan for social change that incorporates a global perspective or lens into your local practice and role as a nurse leader. • Explain how you would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into your local practice and role as a nurse leader. • Explain how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact your local practice and role as a nurse leader. • Explain how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into your local practice as a nurse leader represents and contributes to social change. Be specific and provide examples.	Points: Points Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%) Response provides a clear and thorough explanation of how one would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into his/her role as a nurse leader. Response provides a clear and thorough explanation of how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact local practice and the role as a nurse leader. Response clearly and thoroughly explains in detail how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens in one’s role as a nurse represents and contributes to social change. Accurate and detailed supporting examples are provided. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 28 (28%) – 31 (31%) Response provides an explanation of how one would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into his/her role as a nurse leader. Response provides an explanation of how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact local practice and the role as a nurse leader. Response explains how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens in one’s role as a nurse represents and contributes to social change. Some supporting examples are provided. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 25 (25%) – 27 (27%) Explanation of how one would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into his/her role as a nurse leader is vague or incomplete. Explanation of how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact local practice and the role as a nurse leader is vague or incomplete. Explanation of how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens in one’s role as a nurse represents and contributes to social change, and/or supporting examples provided, are vague or incomplete. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 24 (24%) Explanation of how one would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into his/her role as a nurse leader is vague and incomplete, or is missing. Explanation of how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact local practice and the role as a nurse leader is vague and incomplete, or is missing. Explanation of how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens in one’s role as a nurse represents and contributes to social change, and/or supporting examples, is missing. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.	Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation	Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.	Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Feedback:

Global Healthcare Issues and Policies

Part 1: Global Health Comparison Matrix

Focusing on the country you selected and the U.S., complete the Global Health Comparison Matrix. Be sure to address the following:

• Consider the U.S. national/federal health policies that have been adapted for the global health issue you selected from the WHO global health agenda. Compare these policies to the additional country you selected for study.

Points:

Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Response provides a clear and accurate explanation of the strengths and weaknesses of policies in the U.S. and another country.

Response provides a clear and accurate explanation of how the social determinants of health impact the issue in the U.S. and in another country. Specific examples are provided.

Response provides a clear and accurate explanation of how the governments of the two countries address cost, quality, and access related to the issue.

Response provides a clear and accurate explanation of how the policy in each of the two countries impacts the health of the global population. Detailed and accurate supporting examples are provided.

Response provides a clear and complete explanation of how the policies in each country impact the role of the nurse.

Response provides an accurate and detailed explanation of how the global health issues impact local healthcare organizations and policies in each of the two countries.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Response provides an explanation of the strengths and weaknesses of policies in the U.S. and another country.

Response provides an explanation of how the social determinants of health impact the issue in the U.S. and in another country. Specific examples may be provided.

Response provides an explanation of how the governments of the two countries address cost, quality, and access related to the issue.

Response provides an explanation of how the policy in each of the two countries impacts the health of the global population. Supporting examples may be provided.

Response provides an explanation of how the policies in each country impact the role of the nurse.

Response provides an explanation of how the global health issues impact local healthcare organizations and policies in each of the two countries.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Explanation of the strengths and weaknesses of policies in the U.S. and another country is vague or inaccurate.

Explanation of how the social determinants of health impact the issue in the U.S. and another country, and/or the examples, are vague or inaccurate.

Explanation of how the governments of the two countries address cost, quality, and access related to the issue is vague or inaccurate.

Explanation of how the policy in each of the two countries impacts the health of the global population, and/or supporting examples, is vague or inaccurate.

Explanation of how the policies in each country impact the role of the nurse is vague or incomplete.

Explanation of how global health issues impact local healthcare organizations and policies in each of the two countries is vague or inaccurate.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Explanation of the strengths and weaknesses of policies in the U.S. and another country is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Explanation of how the social determinants of health impact the issue in the U.S. and in another country, and the examples, are vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Explanation of how the governments of the two countries address cost, quality, and access related to the issue is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Explanation of how the policy in each of the two countries impacts the global population, and supporting examples, is missing.

Explanation of how the policies in each country impact the role of the nurse is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Explanation of how global health issues impact local healthcare organizations and policies in both countries is missing.

Feedback:

The Nurse’s Role in Global Healthcare

Part 2: A Plan for Social Change

Reflect on the global health policy comparison and analysis you conducted in Part 1 of the Assignment. In a 1-page response, create a plan for social change that incorporates a global perspective or lens into your local practice and role as a nurse leader.

• Explain how you would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into your local practice and role as a nurse leader.

• Explain how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact your local practice and role as a nurse leader.

• Explain how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into your local practice as a nurse leader represents and contributes to social change. Be specific and provide examples.

Points:

Points Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)

Response provides a clear and thorough explanation of how one would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into his/her role as a nurse leader.

Response provides a clear and thorough explanation of how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact local practice and the role as a nurse leader.

Response clearly and thoroughly explains in detail how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens in one’s role as a nurse represents and contributes to social change. Accurate and detailed supporting examples are provided.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 28 (28%) – 31 (31%)

Response provides an explanation of how one would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into his/her role as a nurse leader.

Response provides an explanation of how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact local practice and the role as a nurse leader.

Response explains how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens in one’s role as a nurse represents and contributes to social change. Some supporting examples are provided.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 25 (25%) – 27 (27%)

Explanation of how one would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into his/her role as a nurse leader is vague or incomplete.

Explanation of how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact local practice and the role as a nurse leader is vague or incomplete.

Explanation of how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens in one’s role as a nurse represents and contributes to social change, and/or supporting examples provided, are vague or incomplete.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 24 (24%)

Explanation of how one would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into his/her role as a nurse leader is vague and incomplete, or is missing.

Explanation of how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact local practice and the role as a nurse leader is vague and incomplete, or is missing.

Explanation of how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens in one’s role as a nurse represents and contributes to social change, and/or supporting examples, is missing.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

Points:

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

Points:

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

Points:

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

Feedback:

Show DescriptionsShow Feedback

Global Healthcare Issues and Policies

Part 1: Global Health Comparison Matrix

Focusing on the country you selected and the U.S., complete the Global Health Comparison Matrix. Be sure to address the following:

• Consider the U.S. national/federal health policies that have been adapted for the global health issue you selected from the WHO global health agenda. Compare these policies to the additional country you selected for study.—

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent45
(45%) – 50
(50%)

Response provides a clear and accurate explanation of the strengths and weaknesses of policies in the U.S. and another country.

Response provides a clear and accurate explanation of how the social determinants of health impact the issue in the U.S. and in another country. Specific examples are provided.

Response provides a clear and accurate explanation of how the governments of the two countries address cost, quality, and access related to the issue.

Response provides a clear and accurate explanation of how the policy in each of the two countries impacts the health of the global population. Detailed and accurate supporting examples are provided.

Response provides a clear and complete explanation of how the policies in each country impact the role of the nurse.

Response provides an accurate and detailed explanation of how the global health issues impact local healthcare organizations and policies in each of the two countries.

Good40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Response provides an explanation of the strengths and weaknesses of policies in the U.S. and another country.

Response provides an explanation of how the social determinants of health impact the issue in the U.S. and in another country. Specific examples may be provided.

Response provides an explanation of how the governments of the two countries address cost, quality, and access related to the issue.

Response provides an explanation of how the policy in each of the two countries impacts the health of the global population. Supporting examples may be provided.

Response provides an explanation of how the policies in each country impact the role of the nurse.

Response provides an explanation of how the global health issues impact local healthcare organizations and policies in each of the two countries.

Fair35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Explanation of the strengths and weaknesses of policies in the U.S. and another country is vague or inaccurate.

Explanation of how the social determinants of health impact the issue in the U.S. and another country, and/or the examples, are vague or inaccurate.

Explanation of how the governments of the two countries address cost, quality, and access related to the issue is vague or inaccurate.

Explanation of how the policy in each of the two countries impacts the health of the global population, and/or supporting examples, is vague or inaccurate.

Explanation of how the policies in each country impact the role of the nurse is vague or incomplete.

Explanation of how global health issues impact local healthcare organizations and policies in each of the two countries is vague or inaccurate.

Poor0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Explanation of the strengths and weaknesses of policies in the U.S. and another country is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Explanation of how the social determinants of health impact the issue in the U.S. and in another country, and the examples, are vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Explanation of how the governments of the two countries address cost, quality, and access related to the issue is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Explanation of how the policy in each of the two countries impacts the global population, and supporting examples, is missing.

Explanation of how the policies in each country impact the role of the nurse is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Explanation of how global health issues impact local healthcare organizations and policies in both countries is missing.

Feedback:

The Nurse’s Role in Global Healthcare

Part 2: A Plan for Social Change

Reflect on the global health policy comparison and analysis you conducted in Part 1 of the Assignment. In a 1-page response, create a plan for social change that incorporates a global perspective or lens into your local practice and role as a nurse leader.

• Explain how you would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into your local practice and role as a nurse leader.

• Explain how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact your local practice and role as a nurse leader.

• Explain how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into your local practice as a nurse leader represents and contributes to social change. Be specific and provide examples.—

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent32
(32%) – 35
(35%)

Response provides a clear and thorough explanation of how one would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into his/her role as a nurse leader.

Response provides a clear and thorough explanation of how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact local practice and the role as a nurse leader.

Good28 (28%) – 31 (31%)

Response provides an explanation of how one would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into his/her role as a nurse leader.

Response provides an explanation of how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact local practice and the role as a nurse leader.

Response explains how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens in one’s role as a nurse represents and contributes to social change. Some supporting examples are provided.

Fair25 (25%) – 27 (27%)

Explanation of how one would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into his/her role as a nurse leader is vague or incomplete.

Explanation of how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact local practice and the role as a nurse leader is vague or incomplete.

Poor0 (0%) – 24 (24%)

Explanation of how one would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into his/her role as a nurse leader is vague and incomplete, or is missing.

Explanation of how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact local practice and the role as a nurse leader is vague and incomplete, or is missing.

Explanation of how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens in one’s role as a nurse represents and contributes to social change, and/or supporting examples, is missing.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.—

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent5
(5%) – 5
(5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

Good4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

Fair3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

Poor0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation—

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent5
(5%) – 5
(5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

Good4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Fair3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Poor0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.—

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent5
(5%) – 5
(5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

Good4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

Fair3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

Poor0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

Feedback:

Total Points: 100