According Chernichovsky (2009), the term Socialize medicine is defined as a health system where by which the government owns and operates both the financing of healthcare and also its delivery. In other words, socialized medicine is one of the many forms of social insurance. Therefore, it is important to remember that there is difference between social health insurance. On the other hand, the social health insurance is defined as those systems whereby which people transfer their financial risk of medical bills to a risk pool. During this era of increased socialized medicine, it has come with its pros and cons on the confidentiality, rights, safety, and the security of patients.
This essay examines the pros and cons of the confidentiality, safety, rights, and the security of patients in an era of increased socialized medicine.
Pros of the Confidentiality, Safety, Rights, and the Security of Patients in an Era of Increased Socialized Medicine
There are numerous reasons for ensuring that there is protection of the privacy, security, and confidentiality of the health information. There are some theorists that have pointed out that privacy is a basic human right or good that has got some intrinsic values. They are of the argument that privacy is in itself objectively valuable, as an important component of human well-being. They are of the belief that by respecting another person’s privacy is a form of realizing the attributes that enable humans to have their own moral uniqueness. When going for the socialized medicine, an individual is required to give his or her personal health records. The principle of bioethics of non-malefience require for the sage guarding of personal privacy. Breaching an individual’s confidentiality and privacy do not only affect an individual’s dignity, and might as well cause harm (Gostin, Levit & Nass, 2009). In the event that an individual’s…………………………..
The postappeared first on .
Hi there! Click one of our representatives below and we will get back to you as soon as possible.