Team PowerPoint Presentation: Critical Review and Evaluation of Health Promotion Protocol/Practice
Goal:
To complete a review of a screening tool utilized by nurse practitioners in maintaining individual, family or community health.
Your presentation should include the following:
1. Identify and select a screening tool 2. Research of ethical, economical and legal issues relative to the practice in relation to health promotion protocol/practice. 3. Provide recommendations.
Submission Instructions:
Presentation is original work and logically organized in current APA style including citation of references.
Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
PowerPoint presentation with 10-15 slides, excluding the tile slide and the reference slide.
The presentation is clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.
Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.
Rubric
Presentation Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
Edit criterion description Delete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Identification of Main Issues/Problems _2286
view longer description
Range
threshold: pts
Edit rating Delete rating
4.0 to >3.0 pts
Distinguished
Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.
blank
Edit rating Delete rating
3.0 to >2.0 pts
Excellent
Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.
50391_2101
Edit rating Delete rating
2.0 to >1.0 pts
Fair
Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.
50391_1645
Edit rating Delete rating
1.0 to >0 pts
Poor
Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.
blank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/ 4.0 pts
—
Edit criterion description Delete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms _1934
view longer description
Range
threshold: pts
Edit rating Delete rating
4.0 to >3.0 pts
Distinguished
Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.
_133
Edit rating Delete rating
3.0 to >2.0 pts
Excellent
Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.
50391_2765
Edit rating Delete rating
2.0 to >1.0 pts
Fair
Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.
50391_2295
Edit rating Delete rating
1.0 to >0 pts
Poor
Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.
_2659
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/ 4.0 pts
—
Edit criterion description Delete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding _8355
view longer description
Range
threshold: pts
Edit rating Delete rating
4.0 to >3.0 pts
Distinguished
Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.
_9439
Edit rating Delete rating
3.0 to >2.0 pts
Excellent
Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.
50391_2559
Edit rating Delete rating
2.0 to >1.0 pts
Fair
Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.
50391_8924
Edit rating Delete rating
1.0 to >0 pts
Poor
Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.
_9051
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/ 4.0 pts
—
Edit criterion description Delete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature _1242
view longer description
Range
threshold: pts
Edit rating Delete rating
4.0 to >3.0 pts
Distinguished
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.
_3392
Edit rating Delete rating
3.0 to >2.0 pts
Excellent
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.
50391_5952
Edit rating Delete rating
2.0 to >1.0 pts
Fair
Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.
50391_1094
Edit rating Delete rating
1.0 to >0 pts
Poor
Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.
_6840
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/ 4.0 pts
—
Edit criterion description Delete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines _3811 Includes speaker’s notes and the assigned number of slides.
view longer description
Range
threshold: pts
Edit rating Delete rating
4.0 to >3.0 pts
Distinguished
Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.
_8993
Edit rating Delete rating
3.0 to >2.0 pts
Excellent
Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.
50391_4906
Edit rating Delete rating
2.0 to >1.0 pts
Fair
Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.
50391_4916
Edit rating Delete rating
1.0 to >0 pts
Poor
Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.
_3820
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/