Two part-

Part 1

Using this article https://health.ucdavis.edu/welcome/features/20071114_cardio-tobacco/ , explain in a short paragraph

• why you think scientific evidence provided by Patterson or by researchers examining the effects of second-hand cigarette smoke was countered so strongly by the big petroleum and tobacco companies.
• How do you think the “big money” provided by these industries to fund alternate research efforts reflects the importance of the role of funding in research?

Part 2

• Review the Sample Question Development Worksheet (ATTACHED)before submitting part 2

In Project 1, you selected a news story (ATTACHED) and completed the topic exploration graphic organizer (ATTACHED). Use this information to assist with completing the Question

Development Worksheet Template (ATTACHED), addressing the following critical elements:

I. Why did you select this news story for scientific and personal study? In other words, what was it about the news story that interested you or made you

curious?

II. What prior knowledge and assumptions about the science topic did you have before viewing this news story? In other words, describe what you already

knew about the topic.

III. How does this news story relate to the natural science concepts? In other words, which principles of natural science are relevant to the news story you selected?

IV. What question related to the topic in the news story would you, assuming the role of a natural scientist, like to study? Use your previous responses and

the list of questions that you posed in your topic exploration graphic organizer (ATTACHED) to select one question that interests you.

Review the Question Development Worksheet Sample(ATTACHED) for an exemplar.