“crisis” in social psychology
Essay Question
1. To what extent has the “crisis” in social psychology been resolved?
Essay Question
2. How might social constructionism undermine the assumptions and practices of professional psychologists? Does social constructionism present a threat to the future of psychology?
Essay Question
3. The rich, including those who are comfortable, work very hard for their money; the people who are not doing well economically simply lack initiative or are lazy.
Rich people are simply greedy, selfish and materialistic
All terrorists are psychotic or evil or both
People who commit anti-social crimes have some kind of personality disorder
Why can it be said that each of these statements about the world can be traced backed to the same ideology? What is missing from the analysis?