Nova Southeastern University Physician Care Services Inc Case Study Paper

Published by admin at December 22, 2023

Tags

Case 3:

https://class.content.laureate.net/b3766a5c78fbab2…

https://class.content.laureate.net/57f80db9c6f45c2…

Read Case 3: Physician Care Services, Inc., including Tables 3.2 and 3.3. Review the issues that surround provider productivity, to evaluate whether the organization can be successful in the new era of health care reform.

The Assignment:

In 2–3 pages, describe the metric(s) you will use to evaluate the organization’s productivity. Explain how you will use the metric in evaluating productivity, and how the data will help measure the potential of the organization’s success in the new era of health care reform.

Grading Rubric

EXCELLENT	GOOD	FAIR	POOR
Metrics to Evaluating the Organization’s Productivity	18 (72%) – 20 (80%) The selection of the metrics to evaluate the organization’s productivity shows depth, breadth, triangulation, and clarity in critical thinking when addressing the measurement of success.	16 (64%) – 17 (68%) The selection of the metrics to evaluate the organization’s productivity fully addresses the measurement of success. Triangulation was attempted but not shown.	14 (56%) – 15 (60%) The selection of the metrics to evaluate the organization’s productivity lacks depth, breadth, triangulation, and clarity in critical thinking when addressing the measurement of success.	0 (0%) – 13 (52%) The selection of the metrics to evaluate the organization’s productivity does not address (zero points) or poorly addresses the measurement of success.
Writing	5 (20%) – 5 (20%) The paper is well organized, uses scholarly tone, contains original writing and proper paraphrasing, follows APA style, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate level writing style. The work is supported by the Learning Resources and more than three additional scholarly sources. The paper is 2-3 pages plus a title and a reference page.	4 (16%) – 4 (16%) The paper is mostly consistent with graduate level writing style and may have some spelling, APA, and writing errors. The work is supported by the Learning Resources and at least three additional scholarly sources. The paper is 2-3 pages plus a title and a reference page.	3 (12%) – 3 (12%) The paper is somewhat consistent with graduate level writing style and may have some spelling, APA, and writing errors. The work is supported by the Learning Resources and less than three additional scholarly sources. The paper is not 2-3 pages plus a title and a reference page.	0 (0%) – 2 (8%) The paper is well below graduate level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or shows heavy reliance on quoting. The work is not supported by the Learning Resources or additional scholarly sources. The paper is not 2-3 pages plus a title and a reference page.

EXCELLENT

GOOD

FAIR

POOR

Metrics to Evaluating the Organization’s Productivity

18 (72%) – 20 (80%)

The selection of the metrics to evaluate the organization’s productivity shows depth, breadth, triangulation, and clarity in critical thinking when addressing the measurement of success.

16 (64%) – 17 (68%)

The selection of the metrics to evaluate the organization’s productivity fully addresses the measurement of success. Triangulation was attempted but not shown.

14 (56%) – 15 (60%)

The selection of the metrics to evaluate the organization’s productivity lacks depth, breadth, triangulation, and clarity in critical thinking when addressing the measurement of success.

0 (0%) – 13 (52%)

The selection of the metrics to evaluate the organization’s productivity does not address (zero points) or poorly addresses the measurement of success.

Writing

5 (20%) – 5 (20%)

The paper is well organized, uses scholarly tone, contains original writing and proper paraphrasing, follows APA style, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate level writing style. The work is supported by the Learning Resources and more than three additional scholarly sources. The paper is 2-3 pages plus a title and a reference page.

4 (16%) – 4 (16%)

The paper is mostly consistent with graduate level writing style and may have some spelling, APA, and writing errors. The work is supported by the Learning Resources and at least three additional scholarly sources. The paper is 2-3 pages plus a title and a reference page.

3 (12%) – 3 (12%)

The paper is somewhat consistent with graduate level writing style and may have some spelling, APA, and writing errors. The work is supported by the Learning Resources and less than three additional scholarly sources. The paper is not 2-3 pages plus a title and a reference page.

0 (0%) – 2 (8%)

The paper is well below graduate level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or shows heavy reliance on quoting. The work is not supported by the Learning Resources or additional scholarly sources. The paper is not 2-3 pages plus a title and a reference page.

Total Points: 25

Nova Southeastern University Physician Care Services Inc Case Study Paper

"Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us" Use the following coupon FIRST15

Related posts

HSN376 Health Information Technology for Nursing Assignment

Benchmark – Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft

Identify the education and training of the healthcare professional you selected to study and answer the followin

"Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us"
Use the following coupon
FIRST15