|
1 Unsatisfactory 0-71% 0.00%
|
2 Less Than Satisfactory 72-75% 75.00%
|
3 Satisfactory 76-79% 79.00%
|
4 Good 80-89% 89.00%
|
5 Excellent 90-100% 100.00%
|
100.0 %Article Selection
|
|
5.0 %Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article
|
Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is not included.
|
Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
|
Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is present.
|
Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is clearly provided and well developed.
|
Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
|
|
5.0 %Article Title and Year Published
|
Article title and year published section is not included.
|
Article title and year published section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
|
Article title and year published section is present.
|
Article title and year published section is clearly provided and well developed.
|
Article title and year published section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
|
|
10.0 %Research Questions (Qualitative) or Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes or Aim of Study
|
Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is not included.
|
Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
|
Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is present.
|
Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is clearly provided and well developed.
|
Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
|
|
5.0 %Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)
|
Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is not included.
|
Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
|
Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is present.
|
Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is clearly provided and well developed.
|
Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
|
|
5.0 %Setting or Sample
|
Setting or sample section is not included.
|
Setting or sample section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
|
Setting or sample section is present.
|
Setting or sample section is clearly provided and well developed.
|
Setting or sample section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
|
|
5.0 %Methods: Intervention or Instruments
|
Methods: Intervention or instruments section is not included.
|
Methods: Intervention or instruments section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
|
Methods: Intervention or instruments section is present.
|
Methods: Intervention or instruments section is clearly provided and well developed.
|
Methods: Intervention or instruments section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
|
|
10.0 %Analysis
|
Analysis section is not included.
|
Analysis section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
|
Analysis section is present.
|
Analysis section is clearly provided and well developed.
|
Analysis section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
|
|
10.0 %Key Findings
|
Key findings section is not included.
|
Key findings section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
|
Key findings section is present.
|
Key findings section is clearly provided and well developed.
|
Key findings section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
|
|
10.0 %Recommendations
|
Recommendations section is not included.
|
Recommendations section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
|
Recommendations section is present.
|
Recommendations section is clearly provided and well developed.
|
Recommendations section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
|
|
10.0 %Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP or Capstone
|
Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is not included.
|
Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
|
Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is present.
|
Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is clearly provided and well developed.
|
Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
|
|
10.0 %Presentation
|
The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements.
|
The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements.
|
The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing.
|
The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements.
|
The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional.
|
|
10.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)
|
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.
|
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
|
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
|
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
|
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
|
|
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
|
Sources are not documented.
|
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
|
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
|
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
|
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
|
|
100 %Total Weightage
|
|
|