Jesse, who was injured when a youngster at the home she was visiting got hold of a gun that the homeowner kept for protection, and, the youngster, thinking it was a toy, shot her. She is suing the manufacturer of the gun contending it is a defective product. Her strongest legal argument would be:

The Second Amendment to the Constitution provides for the freedom to bear arms only when related to the establishment of a “well-regulated militia.”The gun did not have some of the latest experimental “smart gun” technology such as palm print coding.The gun did not have a warning that it could go off when a youngster got hold of it.The gun did not have a gun lock.