Develop a well-written paper that includes the following:
- Describe the role that networking can play in your professional life.
- Explain what you’re doing to keep your “professional brand” consistent across social and professional platforms.
- List at least two professional organizations within your degree field and describe the value you could gain by becoming a member of these organizations.
- Discuss the steps you could take to developing a professional connection with a mentor or career coach.
Your paper should meet the following requirements:
Review the Module 7 Critical Thinking Rubric for full details on how you will be graded on this assignment.
Rubric
HCM460 Mod 7 CT
HCM460 Mod 7 CT
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
|
| 10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
|
| 20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.
|
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
|
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
|
8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.
|
|
20.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
|
| 15.0 to >12.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.
|
12.0 to >9.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
|
9.0 to >6.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
|
6.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.
|
|
15.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources
|
| 10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
|
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
|
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
|
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.
|
| 10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.
|
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Project is fairly well organized and written and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment.
|
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format.
|
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Project is not organized or well written and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style
|
| 10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.
|
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.
|
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.
|
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 75.0
|
Next
