- Have any questions?
- +1 (781) 656 7962
- support@cheapnursingpapers.com
Consultations between nurse prescribers and patients with diabetes in primary care
Article Critique. The article you will critique: Stenner, K. L., Courtenay, M., & Carey, N. (2011). Consultations between nurse prescribers and patients with diabetes in primary care: A qualitative study of patient views.
Assignment details
- The critique is limited to two typed, double-‐spaced pages (500 – 525 words).
- The paper is in APA Title and reference pages are required and are not counted in the two page limit.
- Students are encouraged to use the Qualitative Critique Worksheet and Article Critique Tips handouts to help them organize their
- Provide enough information so that the reader has a basic understanding of the purpose, sample, and methodology of each
- Due to the two-‐page limit, the critique should focus on the important strengths and weaknesses of each
Article Critique. The article you will critique:
Stenner, K. L., Courtenay, M., & Carey, N. (2011). Consultations between nurse prescribers and patients with diabetes in primary care: A qualitative study of patient views.
International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48(1), 37-‐46.
| Article component | 2A DescriptionIdentify and describe in detail the components of the study | 2B CritiqueEvaluate the strengths and limitations of the components |
| 1.1 Full citation (APA format) | ||
| 1.2 Background / significance / research problem• What is the topic and why is this important?
• Current knowledge on topic, gaps in knowledge.
|
||
| 1.3 Purpose of this studyWhat are the primary goals or specific aims of this study?
|
||
| 1.4 Research questions or aimsDo the researchers have a research question or aims?
|
||
| 1.5 Key concepts and definitions.List the important ideas, concepts or phenomena in this study, and author’s definitions.
|
||
| 2.1 Research design
Identify the study design elements.
|
||
| 2.4 Data collection• At what stages in study were data collected?
• How as data collected and by whom? |
||
| 2.6 Inclusion criteriaWhat are the characteristics that all of the study subjects have in common?
|
||
| 2.7 Exclusion criteriaOn what basis were possible study subjects excluded from the study?
|
||
| 2.8 Sampling methodHow were subjects selected?
|
||
| 2.9 Sample characteristicsWhat do we know about subjects (e.g. ages, gender, income)?
|
||
| 2.10 Sample size• How many subjects were included in the study?
• Did researchers describe rationale for sample size, including a power analysis?
|
||
| 2.11 Ethical considerationsWere subjects recruited and consented responsibly?
|
||
| 3.1 Data analysis• How were qualitative data analyzed?
|
||
| 3.2 Primary resultsHow did the data analysis answer the research question, hypothesis, or specific aims?
|
||
| 4.1 Authors’ primary conclusionsHow did the research results compare with the research question, hypothesis, or specific aims?
|
||
| 4.2 Strengths and limitations of study• What do you think was most valid about the study?
• Do you think that the results can be applied to the population of interest? • What do you think were weaknesses of the study?
|
||
| 5.1 Implications for practice• What changes in practice are indicated based on the findings of this study?
|
||
| 5.2 Implications for researchDo you recommend that this research should be replicated to validate the findings?
|
||
"Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us"
Use the following coupon
FIRST15
Order Now
Hi there! Click one of our representatives below and we will get back to you as soon as possible.