Please do a critical analysis, deep explanation, to this article in consider to this

questions
:

Explanation
what is the author did

?
How he did it?

Is the study question relevant?

Dose the study add anything new?

What type of research question is being asked?

Was the study design appropriate

for
the research question?

Did the study methods address the most important potential sources of bias?

Was the study performed according to the original protocol?

Does the study test a stated hypothesis?

Were the statistical analyses preformed correctly?

Do the data justify the conclusions?

Where you feel the problems are?

How this paper

help
you or

hertz
you in the final research proposal?

This is the article:

“Ronoh, S., Gaillard, J. C., & Marlowe, J. (2015). Children with disabilities and disaster preparedness: a case study of


Christchurch

. Kōtuitui:


New Zealand

Journal of Social Sciences Online, 10

(
2), 91-

102.”

Ronoh
, Gaillard, and Marlowe presume that about 7 million with impairments globally are affected by emergencies every year, which stresses their distinct vulnerability in facing natural disasters. However, policymakers have largely overlooked their demands, encounters, perspectives, capacity, and role in

emergency peril reduction
. The viewpoint of children and their ability to notify resolution settlement procedures, take direct effort and minimize peril have been forsaken because of their status and skewed power relation between adults and children in the community. The authors presume that the “4 September 2010 and 22 February

2011”
earthquakes and many aftermaths deranged actions and generated substantial anxiety and stress among impaired children in the area. The investigation drew on a case study in “


Christchurch

” to pinpoint obstacles, potentials, realities, and insights with regard to participation in emergency readiness for children with various impairments. The authors utilized semi-structured interviews and focused group discussions with impaired children, their caregivers and teachers to investigate children’s readiness and possible reactions to an emergency. The study showed a substantial difference in how disabled children access available supplies and cope, face, and discern natural disasters. The authors found disabled children’s possible donation to emergency readiness, which gives recommendations for policy and practice.

On PowerPoint graduate-level critical evaluation of the article, including your insights into the strengths, weaknesses, and limitations of that article to your original research project proposal

.