Analyzing the Aggregate Strengths and Weaknesses and Risk Assessment | Cheap Nursing Papers

Analyzing the Aggregate Strengths and Weaknesses and Risk Assessment

Turnitin OriginalityCheck enabled

Phase 3: Analyzing the Aggregate Strengths and Weaknesses

For Phase 3 of the Capstone project, analyze and describe the strengths and weaknesses of the aggregate
and the community where the aggregate resides.
Be sure to apply Mobilize, Assess, Plan, Implement, Track (MAP-IT) in your assessment process.

  • By the due date assigned, submit your response in a 1-page Microsoft Word document.
  • Support your responses with examples.
  • Cite all sources in APA format.

Phase 4: Risk Assessment

For Phase 4 of your project, you will select a family in your aggregate and complete a risk assessment in
the field using the information from chapter 18 “Community as Client: Assessment and Analysis” and
“Appendix D Friedman Family Assessment Model (Short Form)” as a guide. Describe how the family,
environment, home, and risk assessments were conducted, using your course textbook as a reference.
Describe the results of the assessments, drawing conclusions about the health risks to the aggregate as you
see them.

  • By the due date assigned, submit your response in a 2- to 3-page Microsoft Word document.
  • Support your responses with examples.
  • Cite all sources in APA format.

Submission Details:

Combine Phase 3 and Phase 4 documents into one paper. Use bold sub-headings in the paper to distinguish
Phase 3 from Phase 4.
Phase 3: Analyzing the Aggregate Strengths and Weaknesses and Phase 4: Risk Assessment

Rubric Name: NSG4075 Week 4 Project Rubric


Criteria

Student did not submit assignment.

MAP-IT is not reflected in the assessment process.

Few MAP-IT aspects applied to the assessment process.

MAP-IT applied to the assessment process with missing
elements.

Clearly applied MAP- IT in the assessment process.

Criteria

Student did not submit assignment

Lack of strengths identified.

Briefly mentioned the strengths.

Identified the strengths but without explanation.

Thoroughly described and analyzed the strengths linking with community in which aggregate lives.

Criteria

Student did not submit assignment

Lack of weaknesses
identified.

Briefly mentioned the
weaknesses.

Identified the
weaknesses but without explanation.

Thoroughly described
and analyzed the weaknesses linking with community in which aggregate lives.

Criteria

Student did not submit assignment.

Lack of description of
how the family, environment, home, and risk assessments were conducted.

Briefly mentioned how
the family, environment, home, and risk assessments were conducted.

Mentioned in detail
how the family, environment, home, and risk assessments were conducted,
using the course textbook as a reference.

Thoroughly described
how the family, environment, home, and risk assessments were conducted,
using the course textbook as a reference.

Criteria

Student did not submit assignment.

No health risks
Identified.

Identified the health
risks to the aggregate but no explanation included.

Identified the health
risks to the aggregate
and explanation
included vaguely relating to the risk assessment.

Identified the health
risks to the aggregate
and explanation
included clearly relating to the risk assessment.

Criteria

Student did not submit assignment.

Cited one source and
it was not a journal article.

Cited two sources but
they were not journal articles.

Cited one source that
was a journal article.

Cited two journal
articles.

Criteria

Student did not submit assignment

Introduction is limited or missing entirely.

The paper lacks a thesis statement.

Transitions are infrequent, illogical, or missing entirely.

Conclusion is limited or missing entirely.

Introduction is
present but incomplete or underdeveloped.

The paper is loosely organized around a thesis that may have to be inferred.

Transitions are sporadic.

Conclusion is present, but incomplete or underdeveloped.

Introduction has a
clear opening, provides background information, and states the topic.

The paper is organized around an arguable, clearly stated thesis statement.

Transitions are appropriate and help the flow of ideas.

Conclusion summarizes main argument and has a clear ending.

Introduction catches
the reader’s attention, provides compelling and appropriate background info, and clearly states the topic.

The paper is well organized around an arguable, focused thesis.

Thoughtful transitions clearly show how ideas relate.

Conclusion leaves the reader with a sense of closure and provides concluding insights.

Criteria

Student did not submit assignment.

Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, and/or sentence structure that severely interferes with
readability and comprehension

Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, and/or sentence structure that severely interferes with
readability and comprehension

Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar
throughout. Errors are infrequent and do not interfere with
readability or comprehension

The paper is basically error free in terms of mechanics. Grammar and mechanics help establish a clear idea and aid the reader in
following the writer’s
logic.

Criteria

Student did not submit assignment

No attempt at APA format.

APA format is
attempted to paraphrase, quote, and cite, but errors are significant.

Using APA format,
accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited in many spots throughout when appropriate or called for. Errors
present are somewhat minor.

Using APA format,
accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited throughout the presentation when appropriate or called for. Only a few minor errors present.

Overall Score


This is a continuation from Phase 1…..I have included Phase 1’s document for continuity

"Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us"
Use the following coupon
FIRST15

Order Now

Hi there! Click one of our representatives below and we will get back to you as soon as possible.

Chat with us on WhatsApp